Commentary
Jun 3, 2025
6 Minutes read

AI Governance in Malaysia: Risks, Challenges and Pathways Forward

Dr. Aisyah Binti Rahman
Research Associate
Dr. Nurul Izzati Zulkifli
Research Associate
Summary
While global trade discussions often revolve around tariffs and economic strategy, the gendered dimensions of trade remain insufficiently addressed. Women, particularly those engaged in unpaid care work and informal employment, disproportionately experience the adverse effects of trade policies and economic disruptions. Major trade frameworks such as the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) and U.S. tariff regimes frequently neglect the specific needs of women, especially in feminised sectors such as the services industry. This highlights the pressing need for gender-responsive trade policies that acknowledge and address structural inequalities, including the recognition of unpaid care work and the protection of women’s labour rights.
Commentary
Commentaries are short opinion pieces by the author(s) to encourage the exchange of ideas on current issues.
They may not necessarily represent the official views of KRI. All errors remain the author’s own.

Introduction

The political spectacle of the “Liberation Day” tariffs has sparked new and renewed debates on the role of trade in global development. But the question of women and gender remains largely neglected, overshadowed by macroeconomic discussions on production, consumption, prices, financial markets, and fiscal and monetary policies. To the extent that women are considered, they are implicit, folded within the impacts of tariffs on employment, with workers portrayed as unfortunate, albeit passive, recipients of global economic shocks.

Image courtesy of Edmond Dantès via Pexels

Gender Dimensions in Global Trade

The impacts of tariffs are not gender neutral. Stephen Miran, Donald Trump’s chief economic adviser, has written about how “tariffs are a big part of the answer”1 for extending the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (due to expire in 2026). However, extending the tax cuts – reaffirmed by Miran’s economic team in a recent report2 – will limit the fiscal space for public investments in care infrastructure and services. This is especially concerning for care advocates looking to revive a more comprehensive care package, previously shelved by the Biden administration due to concerns over tax increases. 3 Since care work (which includes caring for children and adults and overlaps with domestic work) is disproportionately borne by women, these economic decisions have significant gender implications.

Gender also matters in other important ways. Instead of romanticising the unqualified success of the current international trading system, 4 women’s experiences and encounters with trade paint a more nuanced picture. In Malaysia, the establishment of Free Trade Zones in the 1970s significantly increased the number of manufacturing jobs for women in export-oriented industries. Nonetheless, these were low-wage jobs with precarious working conditions and long working hours, 5 which had put additional pressure on family members, including older women and younger daughters, to step in for care and domestic work.

Since 2010, the push for services liberalisation and the expanding services sector have coincided with the gendered increase of more precarious forms of employment in Malaysia. 7 Female ownaccount workers increased more than twofold from 484,000 in 2010 to 1,039,900 in 2019, accounting for 33.1% of the increase in female employment before the COVID-19 pandemic.8 Female home-based workers, more than twice the number of men, increased from 226,700 in 2011 to 352,300 in 2019, accounting for 72.3% of the increase in informal sector employment for women. 9 In the lead up to the 46th ASEAN summit in 2025, Malaysia, as the rotating chair of the regional grouping, has announced further liberalisation of the region’s financial services.

Care and Domestic Work in Trade Agreements

Therefore, the solution to the current trade conundrums is neither a return to free trade nor a retreat to protectionism. Regional cooperation is pivotal in confronting the US’s unilateral tariffs, but remains inadequate without broader gender considerations Calls have been made to strengthen the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP), 18 which makes up “onethird of the world's total economic output, trade value, population, and foreign investment.” 19 RCEP, launched during the ASEAN Summit in 2012, is viewed as “the most promising of the ASEAN-centred institutions,” 20 in terms of addressing the direct effects of the US tariffs and coordinating a regional response to its indirect effects, such as trade diversion from China.

Article highlight

"As Malaysia seeks to strengthen its aquaculture sector, there is value in looking to neighbouring ASEAN countries for inspiration. Indonesia, for instance, offers lessons in inclusive business models and efforts toward feed self-sufficiency."

Dr. Nurul Izzati Zulkifli
Research Associate

However, the Asia Pacific Forum on Women, Law and Development (APFWLD) has earlier raised concerns about the gendered impacts of RCEP. APFWLD highlights how RCEP gives undue powers to monopolistic agribusiness corporations, and risks displacing small-scale subsistence farmers (the majority of whom are women) and eroding traditional knowledge of seeds as well as customary practices of seed-sharing. In addition, intellectual property rights granted to large pharmaceutical companies impede access to medicines, which women usually resolve by reducing their own consumption to prioritise other household members.21 The Investor State Dispute Settlement mechanism of RCEP also restricts affirmative action that addresses discrimination against women, a policy tool recognised in the Convention on the Elimination of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW). 22

featured report

Global/National Initiatives on Gender and Trade

Global initiatives to strengthen the links between gender and trade include, amongst others, the 2017 World Trade Organisation’s (WTO) Buenos Aires Declaration on Trade and Women's Economic Empowerment, the introduction of gender chapters in free trade agreements (FTAs), the integration of women’s entrepreneurship programmes into trade, and the implementation of gender-based impact assessments of trade policies. 23 But these initiatives tend to be skewed towards incorporating women into the formal sphere of trade and production without sufficiently accounting for unpaid care and domestic work. 24

Malaysia has endorsed the WTO’s Buenos Aires Declaration, which aims to make trade policy more gender-responsive through data sharing, best practices, and targeted support. The endorsement signals the right direction, but the declaration’s non-binding nature also suggests limitations. Furthermore, all bilateral FTAs signed by Malaysia do not have specific gender chapters or related provisions, and regional FTAs only reaffirm global frameworks like CEDAW but tend to frame these clauses as good-faith pledges without clear enforcement.25 Given Malaysia’s longstanding bilateral ties with Chile, the inclusion of a gender chapter in the CanadaChile Free Trade Agreement can serve as lessons for strengthening gender-responsive trade practices, although the focus on women’s care work remains lacking. 26

At the national level, the Women Exporters Development Programme under the Malaysia External Trade Development Corporation (MATRADE) supports women in various export sectors. It caters to formal businesses, but its impact assessments do not extend to care and domestic obligations. Here, the Trade and Gender Toolbox27 developed by the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development can be helpful, as it takes into consideration childcare and unpaid care work in its gender assessment of trade reforms

Conclusion

Women usually take on more unpaid care and domestic work to cushion the impact of global economic shocks, as we have seen during COVID-19 and will likely see from the ongoing trade wars. The landmark 1995 Beijing Declaration and Platform for Action has urged governments to “ensure that national policies related to international and regional trade agreements do not have an adverse impact on women’s new and traditional economic activities.” 28 According to the Beijing Platform, economic activities include care and domestic work. 29 Focusing on women’s labour suggests that we must anchor trade and regional cooperation agendas in broader gender considerations and place women’s care and domestic labour at the centre of trade policies and discourse.

Additional Resources
Files uploaded
4 files
Download Working Paper
200 KB
Jan 4, 2022
Download Working Paper
200 KB
Jan 4, 2022
Download Working Paper
200 KB
Jan 4, 2022
Download Working Paper
200 KB
Jan 4, 2022
Citation
APA Style (7th Edition)

Devi, S. (2024). Gendering global trade: Recentring women’s labour. Knowledge Sector Initiative. https://www.krinstitute.org/assets/contentMS/img/template/editor/Views-Gendering%20Global%20Trade,%20Recentring%20Women's%20Labour.pdf

MLA Style (9th Edition)

Devi, S. (2024). Gendering global trade: Recentring women’s labour. Knowledge Sector Initiative. https://www.krinstitute.org/assets/contentMS/img/template/editor/Views-Gendering%20Global%20Trade,%20Recentring%20Women's%20Labour.pdf

Chicago Style (Notes and Bibliography)

Devi, S. (2024). Gendering global trade: Recentring women’s labour. Knowledge Sector Initiative. https://www.krinstitute.org/assets/contentMS/img/template/editor/Views-Gendering%20Global%20Trade,%20Recentring%20Women's%20Labour.pdf

Harvard Style

Devi, S. (2024). Gendering global trade: Recentring women’s labour. Knowledge Sector Initiative. https://www.krinstitute.org/assets/contentMS/img/template/editor/Views-Gendering%20Global%20Trade,%20Recentring%20Women's%20Labour.pdf

Footnotes

This view was prepared by Christopher Choong Weng Wai and Nur Alya Sarah Abd Hamid from the Khazanah Research Institute (KRI). The article was originally posted on the Global South Forum (GSF). The authors are grateful for the valuable comments from Puteri Marjan Megat Muzafar (KRI) and editors of GSF

Attributes

Please cite the work as follows: Christopher Choong Weng Wai and Nur Alya Sarah Abd Hamid. 2025. Gendering Global Trade, Recentring Women’s Labour. Depok: Global South Forum. License: Creative Commons Attribution CC BY 3.0.

References

Amin, Shahina. 2004. “Ethnic Differences and Married Women’s Employment in Malaysia: Do Government Policies Matter?” The Journal of Socio-Economics 33 (3): 291–306.

Ariffin, Jamilah, Susan Horton, and Guilherme Sedlacek. 2002. “Women in the Labour Market in Malaysia.” In Women and Industrialization in Asia, 207–43. Routledge. https://api.taylorfrancis.com/content/chapters/edit/download?identifierName=doi&identifierValue=10.4324/9780203434369-6&type=chapterpdf.

Want more stories like these in your inbox?

Stay ahead with KRI, sign up for research updates, events, and more

Thanks for subscribing. Your first KRI newsletter will arrive soon—filled with fresh insights and research you can trust.

Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Follow Us On Our Socials